Note to Readers:

Please Note: The editor of Impact of Sex & War blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

The problems of poverty, unemployment, war, crime, violence, food shortages, food price increases, inflation, police brutality, political instability, loss of civil rights, vanishing species, garbage and pollution, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, racism, sexism, Nazism, Islamism, feminism, Zionism etc; are the ecological overshoot consequences of humans living in accordance to a Masonic War is Peace international law social contract that provides humans the ‘right to breed and consume’ with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits.

Ecology of Peace factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are documented at MILED Clerk Notice.

Sunday, April 13, 2014

Zuckerberg, Windsor, Assange, Blanton, Bundy, Banks, Zuma, Mandela & King EgoFootprint Stats



Hans Astrup, Mark Zuckerberg, Julian Assange, Brad Blanton, Cliven Bundy & Jacob Zuma EgoFootprint Stats

13 April 2014 | Andrea Muhrrteyn |

An individuals Ego/Eco Footprint is determined from their:
Consumption Footprint x Procreation Factor.

Consumption Footprint: An Individuals Consumption Footprint is a measure of their consumption of renewable natural resources. The total area of productive land or sea required to produce all the crops, meat, seafood, wood and fibre the individual consumes, to sustain its energy consumption and to give space for its infrastructure. The individuals consumption habits (size of house, consumption habits, etc need to be collected) and submitted to a Footprint Quiz calculator.

Procreation Factor: The procreation factor is '20' for every child. For every child the citizen has procreated, their consumption footprint must be multiplied by a factor of 20; i.e. (1 child, multiply by '20'; 2 children, multiply by 40; and so on)




Jacob Zuma

Consumption Footprint: 65.66 gha

President Jacob Zuma's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 65.66 global hectares (gha). South Africa's average consumption footprint is 38.59 gha. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like President Zuma, we would need 4.18 earths.

Procreation Footprint Factor: 500

President Zuma has 25 children (some say 32, but I used 25). His procreation footprint factor is 25 x 20* = 500. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]

Net Consumption & Procreation Footprint: 33,280 gha

Consumption (65.66) x Procreation (500) = Net Footprint of 33280 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like President Zuma, we would need 2,090 earths.

********

Nelson Mandela - Victor Verster Prison

Consumption Footprint: 32.10 gha

I have given Nelson Mandela's Prison consumption footprint the same figure as Assange's Ecuador Embassy footprint, for easy comparative reasons; although Mandela's Victor Verster Prison consumption footprint would have been considerably higher. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Julian Assange, or Nelson Mandela in Victor Verster prison; we would need 2.04 earths.

Procreation Footprint Factor: 140

Nelson Mandela had 7 children. His procreation footprint factor is 07 x 20* = 140. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]

Net Consumption & Procreation Footprint: 4494 gha

Consumption (32.10) x Procreation (140) = Net Footprint of 4494 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Nelson Mandela at Victor Verster Prison, we would need 285 earths.

********

Nelson Mandela - President

Consumption Footprint: 65.66 gha

I have given President Mandela the same consumption footprint as President Jacob Zuma. President Zuma's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 65.66 global hectares (gha). South Africa's average consumption footprint is 38.59 gha. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like President Zuma/Mandela, we would need 4.18 earths.

Procreation Footprint Factor: 140

Nelson Mandela had 7 children. His procreation footprint factor is 07 x 20* = 140. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]

Net Consumption & Procreation Footprint: 9192.4 gha

Consumption (65.66) x Procreation (140) = Net Footprint of 9192.4 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Nelson Mandela at Victor Verster Prison, we would need 583 earths.

********

Martin Luther King

Consumption Footprint: 32.10 gha

I have given Martin Luther King the consumption footprint as Assange's Ecuador Embassy footprint, for easy comparative reasons; although King's consumption footprint would have been higher. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Martin Luther King / Assange; we would need 2.04 earths.

Procreation Footprint Factor: 80

Martin Luther King had 4 children. His procreation footprint factor is 04 x 20* = 80. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]

Net Consumption & Procreation Footprint: 2578 gha

Consumption (32.10) x Procreation (80) = Net Footprint of 2,578 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Martin Luther King, we would need 163 earths.

********


Cliven Bundy

Consumption Footprint: 91.10 gha

Cliven Bundy's tentative Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 91.10 global hectares (gha). America's average consumption footprint is 99.8 gha. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Brad Blanton, we would need 5.8 earths.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 280

Cliven Bundy has 14 children. His procreation footprint factor is 14 x 20* = 280. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 25,508 gha (1624 earths)

Consumption (91.1) x Procreation (280) = Ego Footprint of 25,508 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Cliven Bundy, we would need 1624 earths.

*****

Brad Blanton

Consumption Footprint: 85.18 gha

Brad Blanton's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 85.18 global hectares (gha). America's average consumption footprint is 99.8 gha. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Brad Blanton, we would need 5.42 earths.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 120

Brad Blanton has 6 children. His procreation footprint factor is 6 x 20* = 120. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 10,221.6 gha (650 earths)

Consumption (85.18) x Procreation (120) = Ego Footprint of 10,221.6 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Brad Blanton, we would need 650 earths.

*****

Julian Assange

Consumption Footprint: 32.10 gha

Julian Assange's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 32.10 global hectares (gha). UK's average consumption footprint is 48.19 gha. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Julian Assange, we would need 2.04 earths.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 80

Julian Assange has at least four children. His procreation footprint factor is 4 x 20* = 80. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 2568 gha (163.2 earths)

Consumption (32.10) x Procreation (80) = Ego Footprint of 2568 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Julian Assange, we would need 163.2 earths.

*****

Mark Zuckerberg

Consumption Footprint: 408.22 gha

Mark Zuckerberg's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 408.22 global hectares (gha). America's average consumption footprint is 99.8 gha. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Mark Zuckerberg, we would need 25.99 earths.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 0

Mark Zuckerberg has no children. His procreation footprint factor is 0 x 20* = 0. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 408.22 gha (26 earths)

Consumption (408.22) x Procreation (0) = Ego Footprint of 408.22 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Mark Zuckerberg, we would need 26 earths.


******

Dennis Banks

Consumption Footprint: 32.10 gha

Dennis Banks accurate consumption footprint is unknown. The equivalent of Julian Assange's consumption footprint was used. Julian Assange's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 359.34 global hectares (gha). If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Dennis Banks and Julian Assange, we would need 2.04 earths.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 540

According to Idle No More [Life and Death of Anna Mae Aquash 01:02:03] Dennis Banks has at least twenty seven children. His procreation footprint factor is 27 x 20* = 540. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 17,334 gha (1,099 earths)

Consumption (32.10) x Procreation (540) = Ego Footprint of 17,334 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Dennis Banks, we would need 1,099 earths.


Hans Astrup

Consumption Footprint: 359.34 gha

Hans Astrup's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 359.34 global hectares (gha). Norway's average consumption footprint is 61.9 gha. If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Hans Astrup, we would need 22.87 earths.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 0

Hans Astrup has no children. His procreation footprint factor is 0 x 20* = 0. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 359.34 gha (23 earths)

Consumption (359.34) x Procreation (0) = Ego Footprint of 359.34 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Hans Astrup, we would need 22.87 earths.


******

William Windsor

Consumption Footprint: 359.34 gha

William Windsor's consumption footprint is unknown. I imagine it would not be less than that of Hans Astrup. Astrup's Consumption Footprint using Sustainable Economy's Myfootprint.org quiz, is 359.34 global hectares (gha).
If accurate, then if everyone on planet earth consumed like Hans Astrup and William Windsor, we would need 22.87 earths.


Procreation Footprint Factor: 40

William and Kate Windsor currently have one child; Kate is expecting their second child. His procreation footprint factor, subsequent to the birth of his second child is 2 x 20* = 40. [Each Child increases a parents footprint by factor of 20]


Ego Footprint = 359.34 gha (23 earths)

Consumption (359.34) x Procreation (40) = Ego Footprint of 14 373.6 gha. If accurate, if everyone consumed and procreated like Hans Astrup, we would need 912 earths.


» » » » [Astrup :: Zuckerberg :: Assange :: Blanton :: Bundy :: Zuma]

5 comments:

gail zawacki said...

agreed! I'm not good at math, so maybe you could post the reproductive fooprint for Edward Abbey, Paul Gilding, David Suzuki, Dave Roberts, Chris Hedges, Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein and various other so-called environmentalist and anti-growth-capitalists. Thanks!

Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

Gail:

If you are sincere and honourable; I would suggest you start with yourself.

What is your procreation footprint (# of children) and consumption footprint (easy to do: go to myfootprint.org calculator)?

Then simply multiply your consumption footprint with your procreation footprint (factor of 20 for each child you bred).

Once you have done that: If you really give a fuck about what the ego or ecological footprint of your liberal pretend environmentalist hero's is: do the same for them.

Do me a favour: If you are not interested in a sincere honourable conversation: FUCK OFF from my blog.

Chargirl said...

Hello Lara,

I just read a comment you posted on Mike Ruppert's blog nearly 8 years ago.

I set about to find you as I was mightily impressed by your comment...

http://www.mikeruppert.blogspot.ca/2006/06/urgent-message-from-mike-ruppert.html

Just wondering whether you're aware that MCR took his own life on April 13, 2014.

I was saddened to read about this event, and was just browsing through old posts of his when I came across the one above, and your comment.

I hope you're doing well and still fighting the good fight.

Chargirl

Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

Chargirl:

Got some my head bleedingheart computer dysfunction, right now. Using a friends comp & speed dial language.

I would suggest you first confirm you understand the comment you were impressed by, before making the decision to be impressed.

I am not a member of your culture. You are interpreting my words in accordance to your cultural values, not mine.

If my fight is not your fight; we are enemies. I prefer in your face enemies to trojan horse brown nosing pretend friends.

This is where I stand; where Mike refused to stand with me; which is fine. His choice. Where do you stand?

Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

Chargirl:

paragraph edit:

Had some my head bleedingheart bug computer dysfunction; so used a friends comp & speed dial language.

HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]