Radical Honoursty response to Ecological Internet (CC: UTNE Reader & Nelson Mandela Fnd): Dr. Glen Barrie’s allegation that holding Nelson Mandela accountable to same standards as conservative whites, is ‘racist’.
Andrea Muhrrteyn | Radical Honoursty | 18 February 2012
From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 3:26 PM
To: Ecological Internet: Dr. Glen Barrie (**@ecologicalinternet.org)
Cc: Verne Harris - NMF (**@nelsonmandela.org); Sello Hatang - NMF (**@nelsonmandela.org); Nelson Mandela Foundation (**@nelsonmandela.org)
Bcc: Julian Assange; Alex Gibney; Tani Ikeda; Anil Gupta; Woody Tasch; Judith Butler; Perry Chen; Elinor Ostrom; Rebecca Onie; Elizabeth Scharpf; Tim Wise; Bryan Doerries; Victoria Pettibone and Sasha Eden; Bill McKibben
Subject: EI & Utne Reader Visionaries: Mandela & ANC too Inferior to be held Accountable to Same Standard as Apartheid Whites?Radical Honoursty response to Ecological Internet (CC: UTNE Reader & Nelson Mandela Fnd): Dr. Glen Barrie’s allegation that holding Nelson Mandela accountable to same standards as conservative whites, is ‘racist’.
http://tiny.cc/EI-Barry-MandelaInferior
**********************************
President: Glen Barry, Ph.D.
Ecological Internet, Inc.
PO Box 2484
Madison, WI 53701, USA
Email: **@ecologicalinternet.org
Honourable CC: UTNE Reader, other 24 alleged visionaries compared to the fraud: Nelson Mandela, whom the worlds liberals are too petrified to hold to the same standards as white leaders: Julian Assange, Alex Gibney, Tani Ikeda, Rebecca Solnit, Kieran Egan, Anil Gupta, Woody Tasch, Nina Dudnik, Natalia Allen, Judith Butler, Annette Rizzo, Perry Chen, Michelle Ajamian and Brandon Jaeger, Elinor Ostrom, Sandra Steingraber, Ted Howard, Rebecca Onie, Elizabeth Scharpf, Alexander Petroff, Paul Ewald, Tim Wise, Bryan Doerries, Victoria Pettibone and Sasha Eden, Bill McKibben.
Dear Sirs/Ladies,
The following information about the ANC’s policies and practices, has repeatedly been honourably submitted to Mr. Nelson Mandela, via the Nelson Mandela Foundation. I do not make allegations about someone behind their back, and without providing them with the right of reply. I have never received any honourable reply from the Nelson Mandela Foundation, or Nelson Mandela, or the ANC, informing me that any of the allegations were erroneous.
Ecological Internet were informed that Nelson Mandela had endorsed (I) the ANC policy of ‘Operation Production’ which punished African women who (a) denied any ANC cadre the right to rape her & impregnate her, or (b) was found to use contraception; by detention, labelling her an Apartheid agent, for a trial before a People’s Court, where a guilty verdict included the sentence of Necklacing, including symbolic ‘Penis Patriarchy Domination’ broken bottles shoved up her vagina; (II) the ANC’s torture and murder of its own ANC members at Camp Quatro, et al; (III) the ANC deliberately ignored and avoided following available non-violent practices in their ‘liberation struggle’; the ANC’s People’s War violent policies are founded upon among others, Frantz Fanon’s advocacy that ‘Violence is a cleansing force, that frees the native’s colonized mind from his inferiority complex, making him fearless and restoring his self-respect, on the rotting corpse of the settler’?; (IV) Majority of SA Blacks did not want ANC black rule and a significant, if not majority of New South Africa blacks miss apartheid, as having provided far better governance and governmental services, than the ANC.
Ecological Internet: Dr. Barry deleted the information, and accused me of being a racist; for expecting Nelson Mandela to be held to the same standards of civilized conduct as any white world leader.
Whenever I have shared this information to a liberal news publication or a liberal non-profit organisation, they never prove the information to be erroneous; they simply delete it, and accuse me of being a ‘racist’. They never explain why holding a black person to the same standards as a white person, because you believe the black person is capable of all any white person is capable of, is ‘racist’. They never define what they mean by ‘racist’. They never inform Nelson Mandela, that they consider him to be incapable of being held to the same civilized standards as they hold other white world leaders, because he is black.
According to the definition of racism, I subscribe to: It is liberals who think blacks are inferior and hence demand that blacks not be held accountable to the same standards as whites, who are the racists! Are UTNE Reader and Ecological Internet ‘racists’?
I am reminded of Malcolm X’s opinions about white liberals:The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative.
Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro’s friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political “football game” that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives.
Politically the American Negro is nothing but a football and the white liberals control this mentally dead ball through tricks of tokenism: false promises of integration and civil rights. In this profitable game of deceiving and exploiting the politics of the American Negro, those white liberals have the willing cooperation of the Negro civil rights leaders. These “leaders” sell out our people for just a few crumbs of token recognition and token gains. These “leaders” are satisfied with token victories and token progress because they themselves are nothing but token leaders.
The white conservatives aren’t friends of the Negro either, but they at least don’t try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the “smiling” fox.
How can you ever consider a black person to be worthy of ‘integration’ when you practice a policy of denying him the ability to be held accountable to the same standards as others, because you consider him to be inferior and incapable of such standards? If he is worthy to be integrated; prove it by holding him to the same standards as everyone else. If not, respect him enough to be honest with him!
Regards,
Lara Johnstone
Rule of Law Radical Honoursty Multiculti Feminist
My Ideology is Honour and Personal Responsibility: What’s Yours?
Why don’t liberal whites practice radical honesty to blacks, and inform them: ‘we think you are inferior and incapable of being held to the same standard as whites. If someone accuses you of any uncivilized act, we shall just accuse them of being a ‘racist’; for expecting you poor pathetically incompetent blacks to uphold the same standards as whites.’
In fact, any individual who does demand that blacks be held to the same standard as whites, thereby implicitly states that they believe that blacks are quite capable of upholding the same civilized standards as whites, if they want to. Holding any black person accountable is a statement of belief in the black persons competence, should they wish to exercise their competence. Refusing to hold a black accountable, is an attempt to cover up the reality that the individual considers the black incompetent, and hence incapable of being held accountable to a particular standard of behaviour.
Why do liberals think Nelson Mandela should not be held accountable for his endorsement of (I) ANC’s Black Power Breeding War, (II) Mbokodo Quatro Camps; (III) Fanon People’s war Rotting Corpse violence, etc?
[Totally censored from SA public discourse by SA media who consider SA’s black leaders inferior and unworthy of being held to same standards as whites.)
TRC Fraud Evidentiary Arguments submitted to:
[I] 06 June 2009: Complaint to Norwegian Nobel Committee:
Notice of Legal and Political Request to: (I) Withdraw Nobel Peace Prize’s from Nelson Mandela, F.W. de Klerk, and Archbishop Desmond Tutu, for (a) Intellectual Dishonesty & Hypocrisy; (b) Moral, Political and Religious Prostitution; and (c) ‘TRC-RSA’ Fraud and Betrayal; and (II) Accept Nobel Peace Prize Nominations for Dr. Albert Bartlett; Dr. Garret James Harden, and Dr. M. King Hubbert, for Intellectually Honest and Politically Honourable Ecologically Sustainable, Human Rights, Peace and Social Justice Advocacy.
Encl. to Mandela, de Klerk & Tutu: Final Honourable Notice of Legal and Political Delivery: Elimination of ‘TRC-RSA’ Nobel Peace Prize Recipients Plausible Deniability, to allegations that your Human Rights Advocacy is guilty of (i) Intellectual Dishonesty and Hypocrisy; (ii) Moral, Political and Religious Prostitution; and (iii) ‘TRC-RSA’ Fraud and Betrayal.
[II] 18 July 2010: Constitutional Court: Citizen v. McBride (CCT 23-10)
First Amicus Heads of Argument in Support of Radical Honesty Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 34 of 1995
(III) 2010-2012: Equality Court. South Gauteng (07-2010 EQ JHB) & Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA 815/11): Afriforum v. Malema
Heads of Argument of Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty Culture; ‘Boer/Settler’ descendant of among others Dutch, French Huguenot, British, German and Norwegian ‘Settlers’ to the Cape Province: (NL): BOSMAN Hermanus; KOLVER, Andreas Lutgerus; VAN VUUREN, Gerrit (Janse); (FR) DE VILLIERS, Abraham & GARDIOL, Susanne; DELPORTE, Jacques & VITOUT, Sara; JACOBS, Pierre & DE VOS, Susanna; MARE, Ignace & VAN VUUREN, Susanna; (UK) JOHNSTONE James Augustus; KOLBE George Augustus and DOWNING Margaret; (DE) HAMMES, Pieter Caspar; ROOS, Johannes (Hans); and (NO) FURSTENBERG, Johan Pieter; In Support of ‘Political Necessity French Riddle of the Kaffir Lily Pond’ Application of the Radical Honesty Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of ANC’s ‘TRC Social Contract Fraud’; Recommendation to Constitutional Court to Resolve ‘Kill Boer/Settler Hate Speech’ Descartian v. Ubuntu Conformist Cultural Friction by Implementing: (A) 23 April 1994 Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination to provide Boers with a ‘Kaffir’ Free Speech Volkstaat; and each African (Zulu/Xhosa) tribe their ‘Kill Boer’ Free Speech Volkstaats; and/or (B) Jus Sanguinis Repatriation of ‘Settlers’ to European Progenitor Nations.
(IV) International Criminal Court: Communication and Complaint under Art.15 of the Rome Statute: Charges of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, in terms of Art 5(1)(a) & (b), 6(c) and 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.
The Complainants Request the ICC: Prosecutor’s Office to:
Initiate an investigation into the allegations that the respondents are to be held criminally culpable for their endorsement and concealment of TRC FRAUD, the consequences of which are genocide and crimes against humanity against white South Africans, and ethno-cultural legal and political persecution of Afrikaner/Boer and Radical Honesty cultures.
Complainants allege the Defendants cover up and censorship of the ANC and Anti-Apartheid Movements (i) Frantz Fanon/Black Consciousness (‘liberation by violence on the rotting corpse of the settlers’) (ii) Black Liberation Theology (‘violent elimination of ‘whiteness’); and (iii) Houari Boumediene/Black Power Breeding War (“The wombs of our women will give us victory”) inspired TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION FRAUD (“TRC FRAUD”) perpetrated against citizens of South Africa, and predominantly against white Afrikaner/Boer/Settlers; is committed in the context of endorsing the ANC’s institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by Africans over other racial groups, particularly Boer/Afrikaners and committed with the intention of maintaining the ANC regime.
(V) 16 December 2010: Jus Sanguinis Boer Volkstaat, or Right-of-Return to EU Petition to Progenitor Nations (NL-FR-DE-CH-NO-UK) & NATO Military Committee. (www.african-white-refugees.co.nr)
Boer Volkstaat; or Jus Sanguinis EU Citizenship for African White Refugees Founding Petitioners Hereby Petition their Relevant EU Progenitor Nations for:
[A] International and EU Political and Legal Recognition for Volksraad Verkiesing Kommissie (VVK) elections & negotiations for a Boer Volkstaat in South Africa; Or in the absence thereof
[B] Jus Sanguinis Right-of-Return legislation by all relevant EU nations, for their African White Refugees descendants.
Volkstaat Secession / Jus Sanguinis Justifications:
(i) International Law: Jus Sanguinis, Right-of-Return, International Covenant on Civil, Political, Economic, Social & Cultural Rights, etc;
(ii) S. 235 of the SA Constitution & Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination between the Freedom Front, the African National Congress and the South African Government/National Party;
(iii) Just War TRC Fraud: ANC & Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) Truth & Reconciliation Fraud
(iv) Population Policy Friction Theory Common Sense: Peak Oil GeoPoLegal Military Necessity of Ethno-Cultural Secession and Economic Relocalisation.
Why does Tutu’s TRC refuse to provide their legal definition of ‘forgiveness’? Is the TRCs ‘Forgiveness’ Definition: (i) Catholic: Indulgences 4 Sale; (ii) Lutheran: Spiritual Redemption; or (iii) Black Liberation Theology: Fanon Violence on Rotting Corpses of Settlers?“The major reason, I think, has to do with cultures of secrecy.” Secrets, however, are also political currency. Secrets are power. The obstruction appears to be a mix of disinterest, incompetence, but above all officialdom's enduring love of secrecy for its own sake. Concealment is the trademark of secret policemen. Not democracy.” -- The Secret Files that Still Haunt South Africa
Secret keeping is a psychological process of considerable importance if only for its ubiquity. But, while everyone keeps secrets, little has been written about it. It is a topic of special significance to psychoanalysts for two reasons: (1) analysis deals with the personal secrets that people hide from one another and from themselves, and (2) the process of the patient laying his consciously held secrets and later his previously unconscious secrets at the feet of the judging and reacting analyst can be regarded as the central process of psychoanalytic therapy (Rangell, 1968).
Are you a fully-informed International supporter of Tutu’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission? Do you endorse Tutu’s refusal to provide their legal definition of ‘forgiveness’?
Do you endorse Tutu’s allegations that Apartheid was a legal tyranny as a result of Apartheids vague legal defintions?
Do you think Apartheid should be held to different legal definition standards than Mandela and Tutu’s TRC?
Do you know that Mandela and the ANC had available to them a non-violent strategy and opportunity for liberating Africans, but refused to follow the non-violent strategy?
Why do Mandela, Tutu and the ANC Anti-Apartheid Movement lie to you pretending that they had no non-violent options for liberating Africans?
Do you know the relationship between Nelson Mandela’s A Land Ruled by the Gun, Steve Biko’s Black Consciousness, to Algerian Psychologist Frantz Fanon’s Handbook for Black Liberation/Revolution; which advocates that ‘Violence is a cleansing force, that frees the native’s colonized mind from his inferiority complex, making him fearless and restoring his self-respect, on the rotting corpse of the settler’?
Do you know the relationship between:* SWAPO and ANC supporter Algerian President Harry Boumediene informing the United Nations in 1974, that African black liberation movements would adopt a Black Power breeding war, that the “wombs of our women will give us victory” to conquer European colonizers and subsequent thereto Europe; and
* the ANC policy of ‘Operation Production’ which punished African women who (I) denied any ANC cadre the right to rape her & impregnate her, or (2) was found to use contraception; by detention, labelling her an Apartheid agent, for a trial before a People’s Court, where a guilty verdict included the sentence of Necklacing, including symbolic ‘Penis Patriarchy Domination’ broken bottles shoved up her vagina?
* Total Silence and Censorship by the TRC of (A) Forgiveness Definition; (B) ANC’s Poverty Pimping Breeding war; (C) ANCs Non-Violent Options for liberating Black South Africans as responsible voting citizens of Apartheid SA?
Is Evidence Irrelevant to your Decision-Making; because you are too lazy to read it and investigate it; or because you endorse Tutu and Mandela as being incompetent because they are black, and hence they should not be held to the same legal standards as white’s, certainly not to the high standards of Apartheid white leaders?Why does Tutu’s TRC refuse to provide their legal definition of ‘forgiveness’? Is the TRCs ‘Forgiveness’ Definition: (i) Catholic: Indulgences 4 Sale; (ii) Lutheran: Spiritual Redemption; or (iii) Black Liberation Theology: Fanon Violence on Rotting Corpses of Settlers?
» » » » [Excerpts: (PDF: EI: Dr Barry: Mandela Inferior)]
No comments:
Post a Comment