US Court of Appeals for Armed Forces: Media Censorship of Ecocentric Wild Law Arguments in Resource Scarcity Court Disputes

US Court of Appeals for Armed Forces: Media Censorship of Ecocentric Wild Law Arguments in Resource Scarcity Court Disputes Amicus filed

US Court of Appeals for Armed Forces to consider an Amicus Application to issue of Media Censorship in Bradley Manning courtmartial; that provides evidence of Media censorship of Ecocentric Wild Law Sustainable Security arguments to court disputes in McBride v Citizen, Afriforum v Malema and Norway v Breivik which prove the Media's Left vs Right wing polarization agenda.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | EcoFeminists vs. Breivik | 14 September 2012

Application to Proceed as Amicus Curiae electronically filed (PDF) in United States Court of Appeals for Armed Services: Subject: CCR v. United States - Dkt. No. 12-8027/AR - electronic filing [Crim. App. Misc.: Dkt. No. 20120514 || USCA Misc. Dkt. No. 12-8027/AR]

Petitioners: CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, ET AL.: Glenn Greenwald, Amy Goodman of Democracy Now!,The Nation and its national security correspondent Jeremy Scahill, Wikileaks and its publisher, Julian Assange; Kevin Gosztola, co-author of Truth and Consequences: The U.S. vs. Bradley Manning, and Chase Madar: author of The Passion of Bradley Manning

Respondents: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and COL. DENISE LIND, MILITARY JUDGE

Amici: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS: Allbritton Communications Company, American Society of News Editors, The Associated Press, Association of Alternative Newsweeklies, Atlantic Media, Inc., Cable News Network, Inc., Digital Media Law Project, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., The E.W. Scripps Company, First Amendment Coalition, Gannett Co., Inc., Hearst Corporation, Massachusetts Newspaper Publishers Association, The McClatchy Company, Military Reporters & Editors, The National Press Club, National Press Photographers Association, New England First Amendment Coalition, New York Daily News, The New York Times, Newspaper Association of America, The Newspaper Guild – CWA, North Jersey Media Group Inc., Online News Association, POLITICO LLC, Radio Television Digital News Association, Reuters, Society of Professional Journalists, Tribune Company, The Washington Post and WNET.

NOTICE OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED AS AMICUS CURIAE

[1] For an Order to approve the Applicant, to Appear Pro Se (propria persona / pro per), pursuant to Section 35 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, 1 Stat. 73, 92 and Rules 13(a) and 33 (leniency on procedure and Radical Honesty English) of this Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, to appear pro hac vice for the limited purpose of being admitted as an Amicus Curiae.

[2] For an Order to approve the Applicant as an Ecocentric Amici Curiae in the above Anthropocentric proceedings in the form of written submissions in accordance with Rule 26(a)(3), of the Rules of Court.

14 Sept: US Court of Appeals for Armed Services Clerk Response:
Response from US Court of Appeals for Armed Services: Clerk of the Court: Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 13:17 PM: Subject: RE: CCR v. United States - Dkt. No. 12-8027/AR - electronic filing: "Your pleadings have been received and referred to the Court."

Excerpts: US Court of Appeals for Armed Forces: Media Censorship & Left v Right Wing Polarization Agenda Amicus Filed

[40] The Appellants fail to clarify what happens when the journalists reporting on any particular public interest criminal trial deliberately censor one or more parties arguments submitted to the court. Essentially, any court can practice 100% transparency, but if the media choose to censor one or more parties arguments, before that court, the media choose not only to limit the contemporaneous review of the court proceedings, in the forum of public opinion; but effectively, in terms of public opinion knowledge of the fairness of the proceedings, conduct a trial by media, thereby undermining the credibility of the court’s decisions, as a result of public ignorance of all the arguments and evidence submitted to the court.

[41] In the Applicants experience, this occurs frequently with Beyond Left and Right Wing Ecocentric applications to Anthropocentric court proceedings. Applicants working hypothesis conclusion is that the true motive of the majority of these media publications is not “to cover the proceedings consistent with their journalistic standards and obligations,” or ‘to provide meaningful reporting in the public interest’ ; and definitely not the standard of scientific journalism that Wikileaks advocates; but yellow journalism consciously or unconsciously focussed on enabling the endless escalation of the divide and conquer polarisation of their respective Anthropocentric ‘Left vs. Right wing’ reader bases.

[42] Left and Right Wing Anthropocentric Media censorship has occurred in the RH Ecofeminist Ecocentric Wild Law Sustainable Security focused applications, Applicant has submitted in the disputes between [A] ANC ‘Left Wing’ Terrorist Robert McBride vs. ‘Right Wing’ Citizen Newspaper (ZA: CCT 23-10); [B] ‘Right Wing’ Afriforum vs. ANC ‘Left Wing’ Political-‘Kill the Settlers’-Terrorist Julius Malema (ZA: SCA 815/11); and [C] ‘Left Wing’ Kingdom of Norway vs. Norwegian ‘Right Wing’ Terrorist Anders Breivik (NO: ODC #11-188627MED-OTIR/05) cases.

[43] In all aforementioned cases the Anthropocentric Left/Right Wing – South African, Norwegian and International - media provided endless reporting of the respective Anthropocentric Left vs. Right Wing legal arguments submitted to the court during these court proceeding disputes, enabling endless escalation of the divide and conquer polarisation of their respective ‘Left vs. Right wing’ reader bases, while totally and utterly censoring even the reality that the court had received alternative ‘Beyond Left and Right Wing’ Wild Law Sustainable Security problem solving focussed arguments; irrespective of whether the courts: [A] approved the applicants Ecocentric application, recognizing the applicant as an official Amicus respondent in proceedings (Concourt: McBride), [B] officially recognized applicants documentation into the court record and final judgement (Equality/High Court: Malema); [C] totally irregularly ignored the application (Norway: Oslo District Court), resulting in complaints currently pending before the Parliamentary Ombudsman (Cases: 2012-1943 and 2012-1987) and Secretariat for the Supervisory Committee for Judges (NO: Cases: 12-071, 12-072, 12-073).

[44] Applicant’s working hypothesis conclusion being that Anthropocentric media publications reporting on resource-war / scarcity-security court disputes have no regard for scientific journalism (providing readers full access to all original source documents) to report all relevant arguments submitted into the court record by all parties; but propagandize reporting of the respective Anthropocentric Left vs. Right Wing legal arguments their editorial bias endorses, to enable the exponential growth of the divide and conquer polarisation of their respective ‘Left vs. Right wing’ reader base, while totally and utterly censoring their readers from the reality that the court has received alternative ‘Beyond Left and Right Wing’ Ecocentric Wild Law Sustainable Security problem solving focussed arguments.

[45] The applicant consequently recommends the court – as a social science experiment to determine the validity of the Applicants arguments about the alleged motives of First Amici’s – keenly observe the Anthropocentric response, or lack thereof, by the Appellants so-called ‘national and local news organizations… news… whose journalists … regularly gather and disseminate news and information to the public through their newspapers, magazines, television, radio stations and via the Internet’ to being provided with this Ecocentric Wild Law Sustainable Security application, to this court, in this matter.

[..]


[49] Overview: Ecocentric Wild Law Sustainable Security Worldview:

[50] Wild Law: A wild law regulates human procreation and/or resource utilization behaviour, to ensure sustainability.

[51] Sustainability, i.e. environmental or ecological rights and responsibilities are the sine qua non foundation for all other rights . However adding "sustainable" to our legal vocabulary, is not sufficient to ensure that our society becomes sustainable, unless the definition of sustainable is sufficiently precise to enable sustainable living.

[52] Sustainability Defined: A Sustainable society practices Sustainable Procreation and Natural Resource Utilization Behaviour. Sustainable Human Societies: A sustainable human society utilizes renewable natural resources exclusively, at levels less than or equal to the levels at which they are replenished by Nature. Sustainable Natural Resource Utilization Behaviour: Sustainable natural resource utilization behaviour involves the utilization of renewable natural resources—water, cropland, pastureland, forests, and wildlife—exclusively, which can be depleted only at levels less than or equal to the levels at which they are replenished by Nature. The utilization of non-renewable natural resources—fossil fuels, metals, and minerals—at any level, is not sustainable.


[53] Anthropocentric Law’s Inaccurate Assumption: NNR Abundance:

[54] Anthropocentric law views the world from a firmly entrenched anthropocentric (human-centred) perspective, where there is always a brighter future, because the implicit assumption of our anthropocentric political, economic and legal worldview is that there will always be “enough” Non Renewable Natural Resources (NNR’s) to enable a brighter future, and all politics and economics needs to concern itself with, is how to use these NNR’s to provide ever improving material living standards for ever-increasing numbers of our ever-expanding global population. From a broader Ecocentric Wild Law Finite Resource Scarcity perspective, however, beyond Peak NNR , there is no hope for a brighter future, because the fundamental assumption of ever-increasing NNR’s, underlying our limited anthropocentric perspective is inaccurate.


[55] Scarcity: Domestic (US) & Global NNR Scarcity Analysis:

[56] Scarcity’s Domestic (US) & Global NNR Scarcity Analysis is based upon Mr. Chris Clugston’s analysis of data from USGS, EIA, BEA, BLS, Fed, CBO, FBI, IEA, UN, World Bank, and countless NGOs and industry associations, and concludes in general that ‘absent some combination of immediate and drastic reductions in our global NNR utilization levels, ... we will experience escalating international and intranational conflicts during the coming decades over increasingly scarce NNR’s, which will devolve into global societal collapse, almost certainly by the year 2050.’

[57] Scarcity Domestic (US) NNR Scarcity Analysis (pg.37-50 /pg 31-41 )) summarizes domestic (US) criticality and scarcity associated with each of the 89 analyzed NNRs: (a) An overwhelming majority, 68 of the 89 analyzed NNRs, were considered “scarce” domestically (US) in 2008, immediately prior to the Great Recession; most (58) are almost certain to remain scarce permanently; (b) The US imported some quantity of 69 of the 89 analyzed NNRs in 2008; imports associated with 19 of the NNRs accounted for 100% of 2008 US supply; (c) Annual domestic (US) extraction/production levels associated with a sizeable majority, 61 of the 89 analyzed NNRs, have almost certainly peaked permanently; and (d) Annual domestic (US) utilization levels associated with a majority, 50 of the 89 analyzed NNRs, have likely peaked permanently.

[58] Scarcity Global NNR Scarcity Analysis (pg.51-59 ) (pg 41-49 ) summarizes global criticality and scarcity associated with each of the 89 analyzed NNRs: (a) An overwhelming majority, 63 of the 89 analyzed NNRs, were considered “scarce” globally in 2008, immediately prior to the Great Recession; (b) A significant number, 28 of the 89 analyzed NNRs have peaked: are “almost certain” to remain scarce permanently going forward; and a sizeable number, 16 of the 89 analyzed NNRs, will “likely” remain scarce permanently; and (c) Global extraction/production levels associated with 39 of the 89 analyzed NNRs, are considered ‘at risk’.

[59] Scarcity’s Final Political and Economic Conclusion to Domestic (US) & Global NNR Scarcity Reality:

[60] Mr. Clugston concludes that ‘Our Next Normal is Catastrophe’, since our Anthropocentric worldview does not recognize that "from a broader ecological perspective, all human economics and politics are irrelevant," to ‘paraphrase Thoreau, we are ‘thrashing at the economic and political branches of our predicament, rather than hacking at the ecological root.”

[61] “Because the underlying cause associated with our transition from prosperity to austerity is ecological (geological), not economic or political, our incessant barrage of economic and political “fixes” – fiscal and monetary “stimulus” – is misguided and inconsequential. Our national economies are not “broken”; they are “dying of slow starvation” for lack of sufficient economically viable NNR inputs.

[62] “Our industrial lifestyle paradigm, which is enabled by enormous quantities of finite, nonreplenishing, and increasingly scarce NNRs, is unsustainable – actually, physically impossible – going forward.

[63] “Global humanity’s steadily deteriorating condition will culminate in self-inflicted global societal collapse, almost certainly by the year 2050. We will not accept gracefully our new normal of ever-increasing, geologically-imposed austerity; nor will we suffer voluntarily the horrifically painful population level reductions and material living standard degradation associated with our inevitable transition to a sustainable, pre-industrial lifestyle paradigm.

[64] “Ownership of the means of production—from private ownership to state ownership; the methods by which scarce resources are allocated—from free markets to central planning; and our forms of government—from democracy to autocracy—have no bearing on humanity’s ultimate destiny.

[65] “All industrialized and industrializing nations, irrespective of their economic and political orientations, are unsustainable and will collapse in the not-too-distant future as a consequence of their dependence upon increasingly scarce NNRs.


[66] Anthropocentric Law’s Denial of Masculine Insecurity’s Use of Penis/Womb as Weapons of War:

[67] “We must all understand that the most potent weapons of war are the penis and the womb. Therefore, if you cannot convince a group to control its population by discussion, debate, intelligent analysis etc., you must consider their action in using the penis and the womb to increase population an act of war.” - Former Municipal Court Judge Jason G. Brent

[68] In Eve’s Seed: Masculine Insecurity, Metaphor, and the Shaping of History, and Eve’s Seed: Biology, the Sexes and the Course of History, Robert McElvaine described it thus: “Karl Marx had it wrong. Class has, to be sure, been a major factor in history; but class itself is a derivative concept that is based on the ultimate causative power in history: sex. Marx’s famous formulation must be revised: The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of struggles based on the division of our species into two sexes, jealousies emanating from this division, exaggerations of the differences between the sexes, misunderstandings about sexual reproductive power, and metaphors derived from sex. Together, these closely related matters constitute the most important, but largely neglected, set of motive forces in human history. Control -- or the claim of control -- over the means of reproduction has been even more fundamental to history than has control of the means of production...

[69] In Humans: An Endangered Species Judge Brent challenges the world elite and his readers with two choices to: (1) Prove the author’s facts, math, logic or conclusions wrong; (2) If unable to do so, implement his shocking birth control proposal to avoid destruction of civilization; as overpopulation and Peak Oil and NNR resource scarcity confronts regions at an accelerated pace of confrontation, conflict, and war. Judge Brent was forced to resign from the American Mensa Society, because of his views on reducing overpopulation. His writings have so irritated the Catholic Church that a Cardinal devoted an entire homily given at St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York to attacking him and his ideas.

[70] Judge Brent’s Shocking Proposal: “limit the right of any male to father only one live child and limit the right of every woman to one live birth. [..] Since survival of our species depends on the one child rule, under my proposal any attempt to evade the rule would result in death of the evader and of any second child. The rule to be fair must be absolute, without a single exception. [..] Population would continue to be reduced pursuant to the method [..] until it reached 300 million [or a number] based on the ability of the earth to provide resources for humanity to maintain an acceptable standard of living for a minimum of 25,000 years.”


[71] Masculine Insecurity’s Greatest Weapon: Control of the Means of Reproduction:

[72] 1. Houari Boumediene, President of Algeria, at the United Nations, 1974: “The wombs of our women will give us victory.” [“One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.” (Boumediene was an ardent supporter of the ANC and SWAPO)]

[73] 2. Yasser Arafat: Palestinian Womb is his people’s greatest asset [Arnon Soffer, a geography professor at Israel's Haifa University and a lecturer at the Israeli Army's Staff and Command college, first warned of the impending Jewish demographic minority in the 1980s, but was widely dismissed. He predicted Arabs would outnumber Jews in both Israel proper and the occupied territories by 2010. In February 2001, the night of his election, Sharon sent an aide to ask Soffer for a copy of his 1987 treatise about the demographic threat to Israel; it was the same study that had led Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat to declare in the late 1980s that the "Palestinian womb" was his people's greatest weapon.]

[74] 3. Nelson Mandela’s ANC: ANC ‘Operation Production’ Policy: During the ANC’s ‘liberation struggle’ African women were forced (1) to have sex with ANC cadres, & (2) not allowed to use contraception. Any woman who refused sex from an ANC cadre or was caught using contraception was detained, accused of being an 'Apartheid agent', given a People’s Court trial, the sentence was usually Necklacing, incl. broken bottles shoved up their vagina . [Johannes Harnischfeger, Witchcraft and the State in South Africa (*German version of published in Anthropopos, 95/ 2000, S. 99-112): “Especially evening assemblies girls had to attend as well: “They would come into the house and tell us we should go. They didn't ask your mother they just said ‘come let's go.’ You would just have to go with them. They would threaten you with their belts and ultimately you would think that if you refused, they would beat you. Our parents were afraid of them” (quoted by Delius 1996:189). All those opposing the wishes of the young men were reminded, that it was every woman’s obligation to give birth to new “soldiers”, in order to replace those warriors killed in the liberation struggle. The idiom of the adolescents referred to these patriotic efforts as “operation production”. Because of exactly this reason it was forbidden for the girls to use contraceptives. (Delius 1996:189; Niehaus 1999:250)”]

[75] 4. New Black Panther Party: Dr. Khalid Muhammad: Kill the White Woman as the White Man’s Military Manufacturing Center rolling out reinforcement from between her legs: In Dr. Khalid Abdul Muhammad’s 1993 'Kill the White Man' speech, at Kean College in Union Township, New Jersey, he stated among others: “Kill the women cause the women are the military manufacturing center; cause every nine months they lay down on their backs and reinforcement rolls out from between their legs. So shut down the military manufacturing center, by killing the white woman.”

[76] 5. Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party: “The selection of a racially highly worthy wife in itself still does not necessarily mean an improvement of the race. That only comes when the right mate selection is followed by the breeding of an above-average number of children. For what would the elimination of bad hereditary factors from the folk help, if simultaneously a reproduction of the good hereditary factors was not preserved and expanded? ... The birth rate will determine the future of our folk. The number of cribs must be much larger than the number of coffins. Only then can we offer successful resistance against all arising dangers and turn into deed our right, which is due us on the basis of our leading position in Europe. … Two weapons are at the disposal of each folk in the struggle for survival: Its ability to fight and its fertility. Never forget that the ability to fight of a folk alone can never make it possible for a folk to survive into the far future, rather that the inexhaustible fountain of its fertility is also necessary."


[77] Anthropocentric Law endorses the Absence of Procreation and Voting Licensing, to Profit from the ‘War Racket’: Human Farming of Economic & Military Cannon Fodder for the Profiteers (and their Media Pied Pipers) of the War Economy Racket.

[78] “In order to achieve this goal [of world domination], we must introduce universal suffrage beforehand, without distinctions of class and wealth. Then the masses of people will decide everything; and since it [universal suffrage] is controlled by us we will achieve through it the absolute majority, which we could never achieve if only the educated and possessing classes had the vote.” -- Protocols of the Elders of Zion, 10th Sitting, Wallstein Pub. House, ISBN 3-89244-191-x, p. 60

[79] “We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, in order to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world if, instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes. Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” -- U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Buck v. Bell

[80] The Human Factory Farm War Economy Matrix: ‘When you look at a map of the world, you are not looking at countries, but farms. Farm Management & Licensing: State capitalism, socialism, communism, fascism, democracy – these are all livestock management approaches. The most productive livestock are the professionals, so the rulers fit them with an electronic dog collar called a “license,” which only allows them to practice their trade on their own farm. Animal Farm Elections: To further create the illusion of freedom, the livestock are allowed to choose between a few farmers, who provide a few minor choices in how they are managed. They are never given the choice to shut down the farm, and be truly free. Problem of modern human livestock ownership: challenge of “enthusiasm.” Liberties are granted to the human livestock not with the goal of setting them free, but to increase their productivity. Government schools are indoctrination pens to teach livestock to love the Anthropocentric farm. Of course, intellectuals, teachers, artists and priests were – and are – well paid to conceal this reality. You do not have to be livestock. Take the red pill. Wake up.’ – Stefan Molyneux: True News 13: Statism is Dead - Part 3 - The Matrix

[81] Aldous Huxley’s A Brave New World Revisited, eloquently describes the insidious conspiracy to manipulate the masses by propaganda and lies, so as to make them controllable under the “steadily increasing pressures of over-population and of the over-organization imposed by growing numbers and advancing technology”: “It is perfectly possible for a man to be out of prison, and yet not free -- to be under no physical constraint and yet to be a psychological captive, compelled to think, feel and act as the representatives of the national State, or of some private interest within the nation, want him to think, feel and act. There will never be such a thing as a writ of habeas mentem; for no sheriff or jailer can bring an illegally imprisoned mind into court, and no person whose mind had been made captive by the methods outlined in earlier articles would be in a position to complain of his captivity. The nature of psychological compulsion is such that those who act under constraint remain under the impression that they are acting on their own initiative. The victim of mind-manipulation does not know that he is a victim. To him, the walls of his prison are invisible, and he believes himself to be free. That he is not free is apparent only to other people. His servitude is strictly objective.”

[82] In Why Are Wars not being Reported Honestly (Guardian: 10/10/2010) John Pilger describes journalists and editors confirming their role as censorship agents, along similar lines of reasoning as detailed in Dr. T. Michael Maher’s report: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population – Environment Connection, where PR News churnalists admit they are hoodwinked, but omit to say why they self-hoodwink/censor themselves. Pilger’s documentary The War You Don’t See traces the motivations for the hoodwinking self censorship back to the father of public relations: Edward Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud. In Bernays’s 1928 book Propaganda, he described the conspiracy of manipulating the public with ‘public relations news’ to behave as psychologically insecure, dumbed-down, automatonic politically correct zombie consumers (with a culturally induced preference for sycophantic intellectual fairness) instead of educating them to be rational self-sufficient ecologically responsible problem solving citizens (With the courage to practice transparent public airing of dirty linen dispute resolution). The PR image management / Political Correct induced suppression of their anger, creates a sterile, fake sycophantic environment, which ripens in time, when the Human Slaughterhouse Managers are ready to market their next war, marketed for great profit by the Churnalist Pied Pipers, as the PR/politically correct obsessed cultural adherent citizens are finally given approval “for the release and redistribution of their undifferentiated tensions”.

[83] Anthropocentric Legal doctrine holds that individuals are issued licences - to own a gun, drive a car, practice Law, watch television, obtain credit, earn a living as a professional, fish, hunt, sell liquor, operate a business, get married – once they have fulfilled certain skills or informed consent commitment requirements required for the particular licence.

[84] If Anthropocentric legal theory within a country, or internationally, was committed to the perpetuation of sustainable republics and democracies; then application of its own Anthropocentric licensing principles, would require it to implement ‘Sustainable Democracy/Republic Licence to Vote’ legislation where licences to vote are only issued to citizens whose lifestyle – in terms of procreation and consumption – is below the nations sustainable resource use carrying capacity footprint.

[85] No political party or politician who endorsed (a) the ‘inalienable right to breed’ (Human Farming of Economic and Military Cannon Fodder), or (b) corporate or military unsustainable use of non-renewable natural resources; would ever be able to get elected to run a children’s lemonade stand, let alone the capacity to implement national legislation that endorsed the long term extermination of the Democracy/Republic and its resources, for short-term corporate or socio-political status profits; in a ‘Sustainable Democracy/Republic’ where the only citizens licensed to vote, were those whose lifestyle – in terms of procreation and consumption – was below the nations sustainable resource use carrying capacity footprint.

[86] The Anthropocentric Legal Matrix - Attorneys, Prosecutors, Academics and Judges - avoid implementing ‘Sustainable Democracy Licence to Vote and Breed’ legislation, as a result of its endorsement of, and socio-eco-political profit from the Human Farming of Economic and Military Cannon Fodder Racket - the breeding of surplus youth bulge populations, to be converted into “dumb, stupid animal pawns” cannon fodder soldier armies – ‘possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious’ international profiteering racket; where their ‘profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in military families lives’; by sending “dumb, stupid animal pawns” cannon fodder soldier armies, as the “high-class muscle men for Big Business, Wall Street and the bankers” (War is a Racket by USMC General Smedley D Butler (1881-1940)); frequently to fight corporately profitable, but militarily un-winnable wars , such as in Afghanistan (General Stanley McChrystal Speech on Afghanistan at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) in London, October 2009) and Vietnam (Col. David Hackworth: About Face: The Odyssey of an American Warrior and the subsequent Brave Men.)


[87] Sustainable Security:

[88] Sustainable Security is founded on the principle that ‘Sustainability is Security’ (US ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, 24 Oct 2006 ); which requires confronting the – ‘There is no resource scarcity security without sustainability’ - reality that in the absence of a new moral order (1996: US Army War College: Parameters: The Culture of Future Conflict ) where Ecocentric laws are implemented to regulate human procreation and resource utilization behaviour, to ensure sustainability ; ‘overpopulation and resource scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace of confrontation, conflict, and war in this [2010-2020] decade’ (US ARMY & TRADOC UNIFIED QUEST 2012: US Army Unified Quest 2012 Fact Sheet ) and (1996: US Army War College: Parameters: The Culture of Future Conflict ) and (2000: CIA & Pentagon on Overpopulation and Resource Scarcity as Sources for Resource Wars ).


[89] Media’s Self-Censorship of the Ecocentric Perspective:

[90] Research about the media’s self censorship of Ecocentric perspective in their daily reporting, was conducted by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D. (Journalism), Professor and Head of the Dept. of Communication at the University of Louisiana, in his (A) Ph.D. dissertation: Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue, which includes (i) The Triumph of Anthropocentrism at World Population Conferences (1999), and (ii) Population: The Once and Future Environmental Crisis (1995); and (B) his study: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection (PDF ), published in Population and Environment, Volume 18, Number 4, March 1977.


» » » » [USCAAF: CCR v USA Amicus :: CCR v USA]